CONQUEROR vs HAIL OF BLADES XIN ZHAO! WHICH RUNE IS BETTER?

24 thoughts on “CONQUEROR vs HAIL OF BLADES XIN ZHAO! WHICH RUNE IS BETTER?

  1. As a Xin main I ALWAYS take Conq. You would think that in 1v1 situation HOB would be better for blowing up a squishy, then bouncing onto the next squishhy and killing them, but the healing from Conqueror even after the nerfs without the true damage, the healing is just so strong considering you have a heal every 3rd auto it gives you what you need to truely 1v5 teams. Its not only better against tankier teams, longer fights, taking on a 2v1, killing one guy, then healing up with your crazy sustain while finishing off the second guy, its even better 1v1 if you can time your cds for after Conq procs then knock them up and blow all your cds while their in the air, the healing is what makes is worth it. Before it came out I would take PTA. But the only upside to taking HOB from what I've experienced is that you can almost instantly apply your knock up, which can be the difference between securing early tower dives or having a reliable hard cc against someone like Kat or yi. But even then its very situational and just not worth it overall imo except against very specific champs if your team lacks RELIABLE hard cc, which waiting for 3 auto attacks for a knock up makes it unreliable, HOB can change that. Probably only time i would take it. but youre missing out on so muhc if you dont take Conq. and PTA or Lethal are already better.

  2. last test is mb wrong cuz hob xin should have saved sums for later to exhaust conq xin so he does less damage->less heal from conq + ignite for grevious wounds (-50% healing) if hob xin did that i think he could have won

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *